Herbert Publications endeavor to uphold the publication standards by its reputation and integrity. Acting as a medium in transmitting the scientific contributions with rapid and thorough peer review system, Herbert Publications strive to publish the best quality articles. With an objective to furnish optimal directions, It adheres COPE guidelines to maintain excellent publication standards and integrity through its stringent Peer Review Policy.
The reviewer is an eminent person with subject expertise and plays an essential role in the peer review process ensuring the integrity of all the published material. The whole process depends on the trust and involvement of the participating Reviewers. The efforts of Reviewers are the key to the objectives of a fair and timely review process for all of our manuscripts and publication of only the highest quality papers. All the participating Peer Reviewers should adhere considerate and ethical responsibility. Their constructive comments and reports will helps the Editor to take a decision on the manuscript. We greatly appreciate Reviewers for their help in meeting these important objectives. With respect to the Journal, more confined information is available from 'Reviewers' section on the corresponding Journal home page.
All the journals of Herbert Publications employ single blinded peer review process. In this process the author's names and affiliations will be revealed to the Reviewers, while the authors are kept blinded from Reviewer details. After the Editorial Review process, the handling Editor will solicit at least two expert Reviewers in the field with the title and an abstract of the manuscript to take up the peer review process. Reviewers are expected to give a prompt response when approached. This is intended to advance the correctness, clarity, and wholeness of manuscripts and helps editors to decide whether the manuscript has to be published or not. Reviewers should provide reviews with clear suggestions and honest corrections to the Editor who will again forward the review reports as such to the author.