Table 2. Study quality. Component ratings.


Study C_A C_B C_C C_D C_E C_F C_G C_H SUM

(Aloulou et al. 2013) Δ
(Debard et al. 2012)
(Huizing et al. 2009)
(Jit et al. 2009)
(Chen, Chang, et al. 2007)
(Lipsitz et al. 2016)
(Kearns et al. 2012)
(Fernández-Llatas et al. 2013)
(Koczy et al. 2011)
(Gietzelt et al. 2014)
(Braun et al. 2014)
(Braun et al. 2014)
(Van Lummel et al. 2013)
(Wang et al. 2011)
(Doshi-Velez et al. 2012)
(Wai et al. 2008)
(Hsiao et al. 2015)
(Frenken et al. 2012)
(Yang et al. 2015)
(Aloulou et al. 2014)
(Rantz et al. 2009)
(Källman et al. 2015)
(Fontecha et al. 2013)
(Kawada 2013)
(Schwesig et al. 2012)
(van Lummel et al. 2012)
(Vlaeyen et al. 2013)
(Rezaee et al. 2015)
(Merilahti et al. 2016)
(Popescu & Mahnot 2012)
(Chen, Bharusha, et al. 2007b)
(Kogure et al. 2011)
(Capezuti et al. 2009)
(Tamrat et al. 2012)
(Pat Rapp et al. 2010)
(Perrochon et al. 2015)
(Nakamoto et al. 2010)
(Bankole et al. 2011)
(Phillips et al. 2015)
(Anon n.d.)
(Nava-Muñoz & Morán 2012)
(Martien, Delecluse, et al. 2015)
(Martien, Seghers, et al. 2015)
(Rantz et al. 2015)
(Buckinx et al. 2014)
(Kangas et al. 2009)
(Anon n.d.)
Zhu et al. 2014
Gibson et al. 2009

C_A) Selection bias; C_B) Study design; C_C) Confounders; C_D) Blinding; C_E) Data collection methods;
C_F) Withdrawals and drop-outs; C_G) Intervention integrity; C_H) Analyses. Outcome: Strong=Δ, Moderate=◊, Weak=▽.

Fehling et al.Journal of Nursing  2017 4:1DOI : 10.7243/2056-9157-4-1