PDF
2. Fatih Medical Park Hospital, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, İstanbul, Turkey.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Objective: Today the use of autologous blood or more effective use of the patient's own bloodespecially during heart surgeries which requires a significant amount of blood transfusion are being investigated since the use of homologous blood can lead to undesired results. In this study, we aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of the cell saver device on the drainage, need for blood and blood products, postoperative infection complications and length of intensive care unit stay between patients in whom the device was and was not used.
Material and Method: 170 patients who underwent open heart surgery between January 2014 and December 2015 were studied. 85 of these patients constituted the control group (group 1) and 85 were the study group (group 2). The two groups were compared in terms of parameters such as the amount of blood lost postoperatively (drainage) through mediastinal drain, need for blood and blood products, length of intensive care unit stay and postoperative infections.
Results: For Group 1 and 2, mediastinal drainage amounts were 581±363 ml and 323±158 ml respectively, need for blood and blood products were 2.28 u and 1.03 u respectively, and lengths of intensive care unit stay were 28.9±1.5 hr versus 29.3±9.1 hr respectively.
Conclusion: Since the patient's own blood is used, the cell saver method involves no risk of homologous blood transfusion-related infections or development of any allergic reactions or complications. Moreover, since it can also be used in emergency surgeries, it provides comfort and confidence to the surgeon in patients in critical condition and in those with rare blood groups.
Keywords: Blood transfusion, heart surgery, cell saver, homologous blood, postoperative infection
There is a need for large amounts of homologous blood in heart surgery because of large amounts of bleeding [1]. Cardiopulmonary bypass or other cardiac surgeries account for about 10% of all blood product usage [2]. Today, because of the harmful effects ofhomologous blood use such as febrile reactions or bacterial infections, the use of autologous blood or more effective use of the patient's own blood especially during heart surgeries are being investigated [3].
Autotransfusion has reduced the homologous blood use from an average of 7-8 units to 1-2 units [4]. Moreover, autotransfusion is safe in surgical interventions in patients with rare blood groups, those who require emergency surgery and those with hypersensitivity [4].
In this study, we aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of cell saver device on the drainage, need for blood and blood products, postoperative infections, length of intensive care unit stay and discharge time between patients in whom the device was and was not used.
170 patients who underwent open heart surgery between January 2014 and December 2015 were studied. 85 of these patients constituted the control group (group 1) and 85 were the study group (group 2) Following the median sternotomy, patients were anticoagulated with heparin sodium to attain an ACT (activated clotting time) of 480 seconds, routine aortic cannulation and right atrial two stage venous cannulation was performed, then the pump was initiated. Membrane oxygenator was used in all patients, and the operation was performed under moderate hypothermia induced by warm and cold blood cardioplegia.
The 'cell saver' device was used in the study group. The remaining blood from the extracorporeal circulation, was aspirated into the device, centrifuged, washed with saline, and administered to the patients as erythrocyte suspension.
The patients were compared in terms of age, gender, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), cross-clamp (CC) time and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
Additionally, hematocrit, platelets, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, RBCs and WBCs were measured in blood samples collected at two times, preoperatively and on the postoperative first day. Activated prothrombin time (APTT) and ACT were measured only on the day of surgery.
The two groups were compared in terms of the amounts of blood transfused (from donors, banks and total), total drainages, blood amounts collected into the cell saver device and hematocrit values, length of intensive care unit stay, revision due to bleeding, and postoperative infectious and transfusion-related complications to find out if there are statistically significant differences.
Statistical evaluation
The statistical evaluation of the data was performed using SPSS version 11.5 software package. The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The association of transferred amounts of blood with mortality and bleeding was investigated using Mann-Whitney's U-test. Significance of the difference between the preoperative and postoperative measurements was evaluated using Wilcoxon's test. Values p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The control group included 62 male and 23 female patients with amean age of 62.5 years while the study group included 61 male and 24 female patients with a mean age of 58.9 years (Table 1).
Table 1 : Demographic and Clinical Data of Patients.
No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of the demographic characteristics including age, sex, DM and HT, and cross-clamp times.
The mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was 69±15 and 63±05 minutes in the control and study groups, respectively. The mean amounts of blood transfused to the control and study groups were 2.28 U (0.8 U from donors and 1.48 U from banks) and 1.03 U (0.6 U from donors and 0.43 U from banks) (Table 2). The amount of blood transfused was significantlylower in the study group compared to control (p<0.05).
Table 2 : Data Postoperative.
Drainage amounts were 581±363ml and 323±158 ml in the control and study groups, respectively. In the study group, almost all of the blood collected into the cell saver was returned to the patients. The fresh frozen plasma transfusions were 1.2±0.5 U and 1.1±0.2 U and the lengths of intensive care unit stay 28.9±1.5 hours and 31.3±9.1 hours in the control and study groups, respectively, with no significant difference.
No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of platelets, prothrombin times, preoperative hematocrit levels, APTT and fibrinogen values.
In terms of RBCs, the difference between the values of the two groups on the postoperative 0th day was statistically significant (the mean values were 2.583.000/mm3 and 1.835.000/mm3 in the study and control groups, respectively; p<0.05). WBCs increased during the postoperative period in both groups, but the difference was not significant (Table 3). No mortality or infection was observed.
Table 3 : Preoperative and postoperative hematological parameters.
The amount of blood transfused was lower in the group in which the cell saver was used, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The amount of fresh frozen plasma given was not significantly different between the two groups No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of platelets, prothrom bin times, preoperative hematocrit levels, APTT and fibrinogen values. In terms of RBCs, the difference between the values of the two groups on the day of surgery was statistically significant.
Since the patient's own blood is used, the cell saver method involves no risk of homologous blood transfusionrelated infections or development of any allergic reactions or complications.
Blood transfusion is still common in cardiac surgery. In the US, 16-20% of all blood transfusions have been used in coronary bypass patients [5]. Massive homologous blood transfusion in heart surgery can cause harmful effects such as hemolytic effects (intra- or extravascular hemolysis, high antibody titer), febrile reactions, bacterial reactions, and disease transmission [6,7]. Moreover, transfusion of homologous blood and blood products increases postoperative infectious complications such as sepsis [8]. The possibility of such complications should be considered when transfusing homologous blood. Therefore, unnecessary use of blood and blood products should be avoided. Additionally, a study demonstrated that based on the short- and long-term results of patients who underwent cardiac surgery, blood transfusion increases mortality and morbidity [9,10].
Various methods are used to reduce the homologous blood use during cardiac surgery [11]. The common purpose of these methods is to increase the preoperative erythrocyte mass, to not allow postoperative anemia and to reduce the erythrocyte loss [12,13]. The procedure of returning blood collected from the patients was firstly described by Blundell in1818. The patient's own blood can be used by (i) preoperative collection of blood from the patient, and storage after subjecting to certain processes; (ii) phlebotomy and volume replacement during early surgery, (iii) returning to the patient through autotransfusion (cell saver) during the surgery [14].
The Cell Saver device was developed due to the increasing demand to avoid blood transfusion and the desire to reduce blood loss during and after the operation [15,16]. A meta-analysis demonstrated that cell saver reduces allogeneic blood transfusion by 39% and the needfor blood collection by 23% [17]. Cell saver method has many important advantages over donor blood. The most important one is that the transfused blood is the patient's own blood. So, there is no risk of development of an infection or allergic reaction or complication associated with allogeneic blood transfusion. The other advantages are that the blood that is made reusable by processing is fresh, can be used not only in scheduled operations but also in emergency surgeries, and it is also possible to use this blood having a high oxygen-carrying capacity, few active particles and low levels of cytokine and active complements and of which the lipid particles have been eliminated, in patients in critical condition and in those with rare blood groups [18].
The study of Chenoworth et al. demonstrated that some vasoactive elements such as complements (C3, Cs) are continuously produced by the cardiotomy suction system thereby increasing their blood levels [19,20]. These high levels of complements and other vasoactive elements (thromboxane etc.) are removed from the blood through cell washing system [19,20]. This is considered to be an advantage of cell saver method. Ozbaran et al., [7] reported that the use of cell savers in coronary bypass surgeries significantly reduces homologblood use, does not cause a significant reduction in blood proteins, platelet counts and the other coagulation factors, therefore, it does not prolong ACT and APTT.
Some studies demonstrated that cell saver devices increase hemoglobin concentrations and reduce intraoperative blood loss in cardiac surgery [21,22]. Postoperative bleeding can cause renal and pulmonary complications, arrhythmia and increased mortality in patients who underwent heart surgery [22]. The use of cell saver, postoperative collection of chest tube drainage and antifibrinolytics reduce blood loss and the need for transfusion [23].
Postoperative bleeding and reoperation also increase the need forperioperative blood. Moreover, it was found to cause a mild reduction in hematocrit levels during the postoperative period [24]. Many authors reported that cell saver reduces not only the morbidity but also the mortality rates during the postoperative period [25].
Cell saver device is used to protect patients from infections in open heart surgery [26]. Considering that homologous blood transfusion during open heart surgery increases the risk of infection by 1% for 1 unit, 20% for 2-4 units, 50% for 5-8 units and 69% for >9 units of transfusion [27], the cell saver method that uses the patient's own blood protects patients from infections [26].
Although the cost of this technique is still a question of debate and seems to increase the cost of the operation, it was reported that cell saver reduces the total cost in 500 ml and higher transfusions [28]. On the other hand, autologous blood transfusion is preferred to avoid transfusion-transmitted blood diseases [29].
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
| Authors' contributions | MET | IBC |
| Research concept and design | √ | -- |
| Collection and/or assembly of data | √ | √ |
| Data analysis and interpretation | √ | -- |
| Writing the article | √ | -- |
| Critical revision of the article | √ | -- |
| Final approval of article | √ | -- |
| Statistical analysis | -- | √ |
I thank everyone who contributed.
Editor: Chunyu Zeng, Third Military Medical University, China.
Received: 24-Jan-2017 Final Revised: 22-Mar-2017
Accepted: 03-Apr-2017 Published: 28-Apr-2017
Copyright © 2015 Herbert Publications Limited. All rights reserved.
