Original Research

Rural-urban differentials in family planning practices and determinants of use among men in anambra state

© 2015 Ifeadike et al; licensee Herbert Publications Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

---

Introduction

Rapid and uncontrolled population growth is a very serious problem in the developing countries of the world [1] and Nigeria like other developing countries with rapid population growth rate has a high fertility rate which is much less than the crude death rate and this is contributory to the high population growth rate [2]. According to Nigeria demographic and health survey (NDHS) 2008, only 10% of married women were using contraceptives in Nigeria, a country with a high total fertility rate of 5.7 in 2008 [3]. It means that an average woman in Nigeria at the start of her child bearing years will give birth to 5.7 children by the end of her lifetime [3].

Family planning isthe act which allows individuals and couples to anticipate and attain their desired number of children and the spacing and timing of their births. It is achieved through use of contraceptive methods and the treatment of involuntary infertility [4]. The population of the world is now above 7billion and developing countries contribute more than 71% [5] and it is expected to reach between 8.3 and 10.9billion by 2050 [6]. Nearly all (97%) of the 2.3billion projected increase will be in the less developed regions, with nearly half in Africa [7]. Sub-Saharan Africa population increases at a rate of 2.53% per annum [8], while that of Nigeria is 2.55% [9]. Nigeria's population is above 167million [9] and is expected to surpass the United States population in 2045 to become the third most populous country in the world, starting to rival China by the end of the century with almost 1billion people in 2100 [10]. Nigeria still has a large unmet need for family planning and a low contraceptive prevalence rate with many having more children than planned and at a shorter than desired birth intervals [11].

Male involvement in family planning is any activity that targets males of all ages individually or as part of a sexually active couple with the aim of providing reproductive health services including information [12]. Men may be interested in family planning more than was actually perceived as reported as by some researchers [13] and were actually involved in several methods from ancient times some of which include coitus interruptus or the withdrawal method [14], periodic abstinence or rhythm method, etc [15]. It was however with the coming of the sexual revolution and advent of oral contraceptive pills in 1960 and other hormonal methods of family planning for women that led to the reduction of emphasis on menand being looked at as women's responsibility [16]. Also because of the perceived impact of men against women, sexual and reproductive health programs became designed to empower women [17]. Men were involved only when there was a need to promote diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections [18].

Because for a long time family planning has focused on women [19] with little emphasis on men, it has actually affected meeting the desired target as it was well documented that the likelihood that a woman will attempt to use a contraceptive depends a lot on the support from her partner [20]. Contraceptive use was found to actually double among couples that received husband-wife counseling compared to when women were counseled alone [21] with associated reduction in rates of pregnancy and abortion [22]. Male involvement in family planning promotes gender equality and encourages men to take responsibility for their sexual, reproductive, social and family roles [23].

The need for male partner involvement in family planning has been well stressed following the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in Cairo especially because of the impact of cultural beliefs and practices on gender roles and also because the social construction of masculinity and femininity profoundly shapes sexuality, reproductive preferences, and health practices [24]. As men are usually the key decision makers in the traditional African family [25] their involvement in a very important issue like family planning cannot be overemphasized. These informed the decision to look at their practices of family planning which could be an indication of the spouse usage. Also knowing the factors that influence the practice of family planning and any effect of area of residence are important which will help program planners and providers in the course of service delivery.

This study compares the family planning practices of urban and rural men in Anambra state, South-East Nigeria.

Materials and methods

This is a descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study conducted from January 8^th to February 7^th 2014 in Onitsha North LGA (urban LGA) and Ayamelum LGA (rural LGA) both in Anambra state, Southeast of Nigeria. The state has a population of 4,177,828 andis mainly inhabited by Igbo speaking people who are mostly Christians and most members of the population are farmers, artisans and civil servants. The study population was 388 males (194 in each LGA) aged 19-61 years of age who were sexually active and in a current sexual relationship with women aged 15-49 years regardless of their marital status but were resident in the areas of study. A multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 388 men from 388 households and the first eligible male encountered in each household was recruited for the study. Ethical permit for the study was obtained from Ethics Committee of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi while informed consent was obtained from the respondents. Data was collected with the aid of two research assistants using self-administered questionnaire for the educated males and an interviewer-administered questionnaire for the non-educated respondents. The questionnaire was pre-tested for appropriateness and clarity on men similar in characteristics to the population studied but in different LGAs of the state. It has sections that explored the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents, practice of family planning and also on factors influencing their decision on the practice of family planning. Data was entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16. Frequencies and percentages were presented as tables. Statistical test of significance (chi square test) was done and level of significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

The study involved 388 respondents with 194 each from urban and rural communities. Their ages range from 19-61 with a Mean±SD of 36.7±10.2 and 39.9±10.6 for urban and rural communities, respectively.

The modal age group for both urban and rural respondents was 30-39 years (Table 1). There was a statistically significant difference between the distribution of the age groups in the urban and rural communities (p<0.05). The highest proportion of urban respondents (40.5%) were traders, compared with their rural counterpartswho were farmers (40.1%). There was a statistically significant difference between the distribution of occupation in both the urban and rural respondents (p<0.05).

The majority of the respondents were Christians (95%) while traditionalists and members of other religions comprised 5%. Among Christians, Catholics made up of 50.5%, (see Table 1). Also, there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in the distribution of religious groups between the urban and rural respondents.

The majority of the respondents in both urban and rural communities were married i.e., 61.3% and 72.2%, respectively, followed by respondents who were single, i.e., 35.1% and 23.7%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The majority of urban respondents attained secondary and above (86.6%) compared with their rural counterparts (53.6%). Half of the urban respondents attained tertiary educational levels compared with only 14.9% among the rural dwellers. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05).

Table 2 shows that 41.2% (80 of 194) of urban and 26.8% (52 of 194) of rural respondents were using a method of family planning. However, no respondent reported use of vasectomy as family planning method. Use of condom among urban respondents was 29.9% compared with 15% by their rural counterparts. The use of withdrawal method was admitted by 11.3% urban respondents compared with 11.9% of rural respondents. Overall, 58.8% and 73.2% of the respondents for the urban and rural communities, respectively did not use any family planningmethod. The difference in the distribution of use of family planning methods between the urban and rural respondents was statistically significant (p<.05).

Table 3 shows various reasons given for non-use of family planning methods. The reasons include being against their religious belief as reported by 17.5% of urban respondents and 23.2% of rural respondents while 7.2% urban and 7.7% rural respondents stated they were looking for a male child. The difference in the distribution between the two groups, however, was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

About 21.7% of urban and 25.8% of rural respondents were of the opinion that men do not go for family planning while about 36.1% of urban and 28.4% of rural respondents stated they were not aware that men go for family planning. About 8.3% of urban and 1.5% of rural respondents stated that their reason for not attending family planning clinic was because only female staff work at the health center (see Table 4). There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of reasons for non-use of family planning methods (p<0.05).

Table 5 shows that 112 urban and 115rural respondents' wivesdid not use any family planning method and there was no statistically significant association between the use of family planning method and residence in rural or urban area (P>0.05).

Table 6 shows that 10.3% of urban respondents' wives compared with 13.9% of rural respondents' wives believe that family planning methods can cause cancer in women. Similarly, 4.1% of urban respondents' wives and 9.3% of their rural counterparts believe that family planning methods can render one barren. The use of male condoms is higher among urban respondents (30.4%) than their rural counterparts (20.1%), while 17.5% and 23.4% of urban and rural respondents, respectively, admit that family planning methods are against their beliefs. However, one third of the urban respondents and 22.2% of their rural counterparts did not agree with the above reasons. There is a statistically significant association between the distribution of reasons for not using family planning methods and urban and rural dwelling (p<0.05).

Discussion

Family planning is a veritable and indispensable means of curtailing the surge in population size in the African subcontinent as a whole and Nigeria in particular.

A high proportion of these urban and rural study populationsattained at least secondary education with many being traders, famers,professing christians and mostly married men. From the study, the level of usage of a family planning method doesn't seem encouraging as only 41.2% of urban respondents and 26.8% of rural respondents were using family planning methods. The rural communities were actually using fewerfamily planning services compared to their urban counterpart.

The condom (29.9% urban and 15% rural) was the most common family planning method being used. This agrees with the findings of Orji et al., [26] and NDHS [3], which also showed that the male condom was the most common modern family planning method used by married men. The rate of condom use is still very low and implies a large unmet need in the area of condom use.

This study found a total rejection of vasectomy by all the respondents. This could be because the cultural norms and beliefs of the society do not favor male sterilization. People believe that a man cannot lose his fertility which is equivalent to masculinity [24]. They believe that vasectomy could affect their image within the family and community.

Overall, a large proportion 58.8% and 73.2% of the urban and rural respondents, respectively do not use any method of family planning. This is consistent with findings by Lawoyin et alin a study carried out in south west Nigeria [27]. There appears so much gap in the use of family planning methods, which calls for more action considering the high population growth rate in the country.

The place of religion cannot be over emphasized as it is a major determinant to the use of family planning methods. This was found to be one of the major determinants influencing the decision of men or their spouse to use family planning services. This finding is in agreement with that of Iliyazu et al in similar studies in northern Nigeria [28]. The implication of this finding is that family planning is not an exclusive preserve of health workers but an area needing the involvement of religious leadersand others with the aim of reaching acceptable compromise on various issues in family planning. There is need to consider cultural factors, religious and other opinions in the communities involved in order to have acceptable and effective family planning approach.

The study found other reasons given by respondents for not using family planning such asdesire for a male child, family planning methods as causing cancer or barrenness, etc. These findings show that the behavioural aspect of family planning acceptance is complex and requires in-depth studies to unravel.

The study found that the absence of a male provider in family planning centres is repulsive to some men and tends to portray the idea that family planning is a woman's affair. This underlies the need to make family planning service delivery friendlier and attractive to both genders.

Comparatively, more of those that live in urban areas make use of a family planning methods than their rural counterparts. There is however, no statistically significant difference between the two study groups. The reasons for not using family planning methods by respondents' wives include being against belief, fear of cancer and barrenness and desire for more children. These findings appear more in the rural study population were the level of education is lower and religious belief higher.

Recommendation
Men should be involved in the decision for family planning methods with their spouses.

There is need for well-planned male-targeted programs and involving male providers at the family planning centres. Religious leaders need to be involvedin the debate on acceptance of family planning by their followers.

There is need to address the misconceptions about family planning and to conduct further studies on the behavioural aspect of family planning practice.

Conclusion

Overall, a large proportion of both the urban and rural respondents do not use any family planning method. Consequently, the level of usage of family planning methods is low among the urban and rural respondents. The rural communities used less family planning services compared with their urban counterpart. The condom was the most commonly used family planning method in both groups with a greater proportion among the urban than in the rural respondents. This study found a total rejection of vasectomy by all the respondents both in the urban and rural communities. Belief, religion and fear of cancer and barrenness were other reasons for non-use of family planning methods.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Authors' contributions	ICO	ENP	UUM	NGA
Research concept and design	√	√	√	--
Collection and/or assembly of data	√	√	√	--
Data analysis and interpretation	√	√	√	√
Writing the article	√	√	√	√
Critical revision of the article	--	--	--	√
Final approval of article	√	--	--	√
Statistical analysis	√	√	√	√

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the staff of Community Medicine Department for their efforts in the preparation of this study.

Publication history

Editor: Randall E. Harris, The Ohio State University, USA.
Received: 22-Oct-2015 Final Revised: 19-Nov-2015
Accepted: 10-Dec-2015 Published: 18-Dec-2015