
Lakshmi Muthukrishnan* and Radhika Raman
Correspondence: Lakshmi Muthukrishnan vcmlck@yahoo.co.in
Author Affiliation
Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, CHILDS Trust Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Objective: To analyze the indications for chest (CXR) radiography, radiological abnormalities and the clinical predictors for pneumonia in children who present withacute wheeze to the pediatric emergency department.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary care pediatric referral hospital between July and December 2012. Children between 6 months to 18 years of age presenting with acute wheeze were included in the study.
Results: Of a total of 126 children included in the study, the most common indication for CXR was temperature > 100°F at presentation (65%). The most common radiological abnormality was prominent bronchovascular markings in 67%. Ten children (8.7%) had radiological evidence of pneumonia, seven of them were <5years of age . Presence of fever during triage (p=0.006), hypoxia (p=0.01) and localised chest findings on auscultation (p=0.001) were statistically significant clinical predictors for pneumonia.
Conclusion: The incidence of radiographically confirmed pneumonia among children with wheezing is uncommon. Definite clinical criteria should be defined to avoid unwarranted chest radiography in children with acute wheeze.
Keywords: Acute, wheeze, children, pneumonia, chest radiography
Wheeze is a common paediatric emergency. Children with viral respiratory infection often present with fever andacute wheeze and a chest radiograph is often performed as it is difficult to identify pneumonia by clinical examination alone.
Identifying clinical parameters which are more likely to be associated with pneumonia in children who present withacute wheeze can possibly prevent unwarranted radiography.
The aim of our study was to analyse the radiological abnormalities, indications for chest radiography and the clinical predictors for pneumonia in children who present with an acute wheeze to the paediatric emergency department.
This prospective study at the emergency department of a tertiary care paediatric referral hospital was conducted between July to December 2012. Children who presented withacute wheeze aged between 6 months to 18 years were included. Children with chronic lung disease, history of tracheostomy, complex congenital heart disease, underlying immunodeficiency and malignancy were excluded fromstudy. The decision to obtain a chest x ray (CXR) was left to the discretion of pediatric post graduates, fellows in emergency medicine, registrars and paediatric consultants in the emergency room who was blinded to the ongoing study. Clinical parameters (Table 1) such as fever, chest retractions, tachypnea, focal lung signs, oxygen saturation (SpO2), age, the need for intensive care unit admission and findings on chest radiography were continually abstracted from medical records throughout the study period. Severity of wheeze was determined by the Pulmonary score index (PSI) [1]. PSI 0 – 3 was mild, 4 - 6 moderate and > 6 was considered as severe wheeze. The variables included in pulmonary score index are respiratory rate, wheeze and accessory muscle activity. All radiographs were reviewed by a qualified pediatric radiologist for the presence (as evidenced by consolidation) or absence of pneumonia.
Table 1 : Demographic Characteristics of the Study population (N= 126).
A total of 126 children were included the study of which 70% were males and 73% were between 1- 5 years of age. Ninety two children (73%) had a PSI score of 4 - 6. Children with PSI > 6 (n=13) required admission to the intensive care unit. Of the 115 children who had a CXR, sixty had previously undergone chest radiography for wheeze (n=52, single & n=8, multiple times). On analysis it was found that 65% of children had a CXR as they were febrile. The other indications being 1st episode of wheeze (25%) suspected foreign body (5%), persistent hypoxemia (3.5%) and suspected cardiac pathology (0.85%) (Figure 1). Radiological abnormalities (reported were as follows, prominent bronchovascular markings (67%), hyperaerated lungs (21%), consolidation (8.7%), atelectasis (3.5%) and foreign body (0.8%) (Figure 2). Out of 10 children (8.7%) who had radiological evidence for pneumonia majority (n=7) were in the age group of 1 to 5 years. The clinical predictors for pneumonia were triage temperature = or > 101°F (10/10), hypoxia (4/10), localised chest findings (7/10) (Figure 3A-3C). Chi square test was applied and p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Presence of fever (p=0.006), hypoxia (p=0.01) and localised chest findings (p=0.001) were statistically significant (Table 2). PSI of more than 6 was not associated with pneumonia.
Figure 1 : Indications for chest radiography.
Figure 2 : Findings on chest radiography.
Figure 3A-3C : Clinical predictors of pneumonia.
Table 2 : Parameters predictive of pneumonia.
The criteria for ordering a chest x ray for children withacute wheeze are not well defined. Chest x rays are performed frequently in children who present withacute wheeze, as it is difficult to rule out pneumonia based on history and clinical examination alone. Pneumonia in children withacute wheeze is uncommonand imaging adds to the health care cost and exposure of children to ionizing radiation all of which can be avoided. Analysis of CXR taken for children with acute exacerbation of wheeze in the emergency department suggests that in most instances it does not alter the diagnosis or management. We found a low rate (8.7%) of radiographic pneumonia in our study population which is comparable to 4.9% in a study from Boston [2]. The prevalence of pneumonia in previous investigations varied widely, ranging from 8.6% to 35% [3-5].
In our study all children (100%) who had radiological evidence for pneumonia had triage temperature ≥ 101°F (p=0.006). A study from Pakistan also concludes that temperature of > 100°F was highly specific for poor response to bronchodilator and susequent deterioration. The overall positive predictive value was best for temperature of > 100°F [6]. We also observed in our study that in addition to temperature, hypoxia (p=0.01) and localised chest findings (p=0.001) were also statistically significant variables associated with pneumonia. The difference in Pulmonary score index in children without radiological pneumonia was not stastically significant as PSI mainly includes respiratory rate, wheeze and work of breathing. This observation is similar to a prospective study which reported that, among infants < 18 months of age, grunting on examination and oxygen saturation of < 93% were predictors of radiographic pneumonia, whereas fever and tachypnea were not associated with pneumonia risk [7]. In a study from Brazil, absence of pulmonary infiltrates was associated with the complaint of difficulty in breathing (P=0.04) and wheezing (P=0.001) [8]. It is also difficult to distinguish a viral process from bacterial pneumonia on chest radiographs, and radiographic pneumonia does not necessarily indicate a bacterial infection leading to overuse of antibiotics.
Majority of children withacute wheeze are subjected to chest radiography as they are febrile, though the occurrence of radiographic pneumonia is as low as (8.7%). Triage temperature of ≥ 101°F, hypoxia and localized chest findings were predictors of pneumonia in children withacute wheeze. Definite criteria have to be defined through larger studies to avoid unnecessary chest radiography.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Lakshmi Muthukrishnan did the collection, analysis of data and preparation of manuscript. Radhika Raman conceived, designed and critically analysed the study.
S. Muralinath, Consultant radiologist.
Editor: Chunbin Zou,University of Pittsburgh, USA.
EIC: Victor J. Thannickal,University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
James R. Seibold, Scleroderma Research Consultants, LLC, USA.
Received: 13-May-2013 Revised: 13-Jun-2013
Accepted: 21-Jun-2013 Published: 11-Jul-2013
Muthukrishnan L and Raman R. Analysis of clinical & radiological findings in children with acute wheeze.Pulmonol Respir Res. 2013; 1:1 http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2053-6739-1-1
Copyright © 2015 Herbert Publications Limited. All rights reserved.